Mitt Romney's Culture-War Foreign Policy

Yes, I'm a liberal, but honestly, I expected more of Mitt Romney. Supporters teased his big speech at the Citadel as presenting a more muscular foreign policy to contrast with Obama. I got exactly one substantive, concrete idea for doing that, and here it is:

I will reverse the hollowing of our Navy and announce an initiative to increase the shipbuilding rate from 9 per year to 15. 

Expensive, and raises the question of which ships to build. (We talking destroyers, LCS, I presume he doesn't mean carriers, but... what...?) Still, not a bad idea, and worthy of debate. 

And that was really about it. The rest of the speech was about framing global problems ("Will [China's] rulers lead their people to a new era of freedom and prosperity or will they go down a darker path, intimidating their neighbors, brushing aside an inferior American Navy in the Pacific, and building a global alliance of authoritarian states?") and implying that Obama is too weak or hidebound or insufficiently pro-American to solve them. Romney devoted more effort to making himself the candidate of American Exceptionalism than to cashing out what that means. 

But that's kind of the point. "As President of the United States, I will devote myself to an American Century," Romney said. "And I will never, ever apologize for America." The implication is that Obama does, and that should be a threshold issue for the credibility of a candidate on national security. Policies are less important.

I know now that Romney's against defense cuts, he's for the Arab Spring, he's dubious of international institutions, and he doesn't like a lot of countries -- from Iran to Venezuela to Russia to China. I do not know what he will do about any of those challenges, threats and problems. He gave an entire speech that without addressing what President Romney would do about the Afghanistan war he would inherit. The closest he comes:

I will order a full review of our transition to the Afghan military to secure that nation’s sovereignty from the tyranny of the Taliban.  I will speak with our generals in the field, and receive the best recommendation of our military commanders.  The force level necessary to secure our gains and complete our mission successfully is a decision I will make free from politics.

You tell me what that means. Would Romney not end the combat mission in 2014? Would he re-escalate the war? He implies more than he clarifies.

What would he do about Pakistan? North Korea? Trade with China? Repositioning U.S. defense strategy toward the western Pacific? (Would he close bases in Europe? Does he think the U.S. ought to reorient its overseas basing posture at all?) Post-withdrawal Iraq? The Israeli-Palestinian conflict? I get that he'd tell Iran it can't get a nuclear weapon, but what would he do about it; and what would he do if Iran crosses the nuclear threshold anyway? Libya? Did you notice this entire speech does not mention al-Qaida?

Give me something to work with here, Mitt. This culture war stuff is campaign rhetoric, and weak tea at that. You're up against a president who you don't like -- but who capped Osama bin Laden and is waging a global shadow war against al-Qaida so extreme it targets American citizens. Good luck going up against that with this. 

PS: And there's still this!

I will begin organizing all of our diplomatic and assistance efforts in the greater Middle East under one official with the authority and accountability necessary to train all our soft power resources on ensuring that the Arab Spring does not fade into a long winter.  

This is a stupid person's idea of a smart proposal. Who is our Man Who Moves Entire Regions By The Force Of His Words? I suppose we have little available conclusions except that Romney meant what he wrote in No Apologies.

Comments

[mikey]

Yeah, but here's the thing.

Romney's strategy for YEARS has been an impenetrable combination of vague platitudes and blatant pandering. It has become clear to him and his campaign that he not only pays no price for carefully and studiously having NO specific positions on ANYTHING, he's actually beginning to find himself the front runner.

The banal combination of familiarity, staying power, funding and weak competition is allowing him to use this 'strategy' of never exposing himself to specific criticism on any topic to make a real run at the nomination.

Sure, the Republican voters don't WANT to nominate him, but that doesn't mean they're going to demand specificity from him...

[Skye Winspur]

Considering that Romney belongs to a religion that aggressively promotes American exceptionalism, I'm not sure why you were surprised at what he said, or why you expected a reasoned discourse on international relations from him.

[PS]

As far as I know, State already has one official to organize soft power in support of the Arab Spring. His name is Amb. Bill Taylor, Special Coordinator for Transition Issues (or something similar). What a doofus.

[web design London]

It has become clear to him and his campaign that he not only pays no price for carefully and studiously having NO specific positions on ANYTHING, he's actually beginning to find himself the front runner.

[implantes dentales precios]

Excellent article, i'm sharing it with some friends, hope you dont mind!
Keep it up!

[Gran Hermano 2012 en vivo]

Excellent article, i'm sharing it with some friends, hope you dont mind!

[Coach Outlet Online]

I very much like to thank you share this message !

[article writing service]

Well said by Romney , just I became a fan of him with this single post!! if I am not wrong there might have someone manage soft power.

[Primark catalogo]

Thanks for sharing.

[pellet mill controller]

I found the hardest job was also the job I enjoyed the most. Mortgage banking has very specific requirements, mathematical perfection and an analytical mind....

[شقق للبيع في الاردن]

I'm not sure why you were surprised at what he said, or why you expected a reasoned discourse on international relations from him...

[Davidjames]

I'm not sure why you were surprised at what he said, or why you expected a reasoned discourse on international relations from him.

[maize miller machine]

You get a lot of cv's nowadays, and the first thing you do is look at them specifically to reject them. Mean I know, but if I get 100 cv's, I have to get them down to a handful that I want to interview.