It seems like every time you read, say, Morning Defense, you get a new optimistic suggestion that the Libyan rebels are thisclose from finally ousting Gadhafi. But it looks like the rebellion has reached Tripoli and Gadhafi is looking at an endgame. Events look so fluid that anything I link to is going to be outdated. (Still, check out this fascinating Renesys overview of what's up with the Libyan internet.)
So consider this a premature guidepost for expectations. Getting rid of Gadhafi is the easy part. The last 10-15 years are a testimony to the hubris of considering an internal conflict concluded once a belligerent government has lost power. I'm not going to insult your intelligence by playing fake Libya expert. But the rebel coalition is united by the singular purpose of defeating Gadhafi, so its cohesive strength as a governing force is about to face its greatest test. Purge the government of Gadhafi loyalists and risk a backlash; let them remain under amnesty and risk fracturing the coalition. What will the military do? What are the prospects for a revanchist insurgency in Gadhafi's name -- or, if he survives ouster, his command? How does NATO avoid post-Gadhafi intervention?
Rob Farley offers many insightful comments here. I'd add one thing that's vexed me from the start about the Libya war. If the international community is really going balls to the wall on the Responsibility to Protect -- an idea that I'm emotionally drawn to and intellectually skeptical of -- it's got to reconcile it with the basics of military strategy. Strategy 101 is about destroying your adversary's capability to fight in order to destroy his will to fight. But the R2P is about separating combatants. It's agnostic on the endgame, except to say, "violence must stop." That implies an endgame of some form of partition. Pretty much everywhere the international community has embraced or enforced a partition, a geopolitical fault line has emerged, with combatants feeling like their wars are merely paused and further bloodshed will resume at an opportune moment. (Run through the list: the Koreas, the Balkans, India/Pakistan, Israel/Palestine, etc. etc.)
In fairness to the R2P, if Gadhafi does in fact leave power, then the R2P will have a military success to its credit. But it will also have deferred an intellectual reckoning with strategy. No two interventions are going to look precisely alike, and the R2P can't bank on implicitly supporting a rebel force. (Darfur, anyone?) Maybe I spend too much time in the online warrens of the military nerd, but some enterprising officers would do well to write some doctrinal guides on R2P; and defense intellectuals would do well toward exploring if they can't reconcile the yawning strategy gap at its heart.
Photo: Evan Hill, for al-Jazeera English, via Flickr CC
I think you make two, well, not exactly 'errors' here, but rather a kind of inaccuracy that results from conflating things that need to be viewed in isolation from one another.
First is the value of a people's uprising against a single-party police state ruler and the quality or stability of the governance that results from that rebellion. The fact that some kind of Jeffersonian ideal is unlikely, and that in fact another authoritarian police state may even be likely does not diminish the value, nor the necessity of the uprising. That the people rose up together and deposed Gadhafi is an unmitigated GOOD THING, and we can still be hopeful that something better will take his place.
Second, when we're talking about an international humanitarian military intervention (R2P), there are some political constraints that make it operationally and strategically different from typical bi-lateral warfare. There are competing interests and political sensitivities that need to be honored, and these create inherent limits to the types and targets of force that can be brought to bear. The goal of the international intervention is therefore, by necessity more limited - the goal is not to 'defeat' the enemy, nor even crush his will to fight. It is to deny him the capacity to slaughter his citizens into submission, and in certain cases were the international community prefers regime change as an outcome, such as in Libya, a secondary goal might be to provide limited assistance to the rebels by destroying air, armor and artillery assets.
I agree with you that, at this point, it's hard to see the Libyan intervention as anything but a success, and I hope it can be seen as a template for this kind of operation in the future. The costs were small, the use of combat power restrained, there was virtually no mission creep and no coalition casualties. This is good...
Oh. Welcome home...
Posted by: mikey | 08/21/2011 at 01:39 PM
In fairness to the R2P, if Gadhafi does in fact leave power, then the R2P will have a military success to its credit. But it will also have deferred an intellectual reckoning with strategy. No two interventions are going to look precisely alike, and the R2P can't bank on implicitly supporting a rebel force. (Darfur, anyone?) Maybe I spend too much time in the online warrens of the military nerd, but some enterprising officers would do well to write some doctrinal guides on R2P; and defense intellectuals would do well toward exploring if they can't reconcile the yawning strategy gap at its heart.
Posted by: jersey wholesale | 08/21/2011 at 08:03 PM
Ce fut un poste très agréable. Dans l’idée que je souhaite mettre en écrit, comme cette fois-ci ailleurs E prenant et des efforts réels pour faire un très bon article, mais ce que je peux dire que j’ai beaucoup tergiverser et certainement pas à obtenir une chose faite.
Posted by: wholesale nfl jerseys | 09/07/2011 at 12:28 AM
Second, when we're talking about an international humanitarian military intervention (R2P), there are some political constraints that make it operationally and strategically different from typical bi-lateral warfare. There are competing interests and political sensitivities that need to be honored, and these create inherent limits to the types and targets of force that can be brought to bear. The goal of the international intervention is therefore, by necessity more limited - the goal is not to 'defeat' the enemy, nor even crush his will to fight. It is to deny him the capacity to slaughter his citizens into submission, and in certain cases were the international community prefers regime change as an outcome, such as in Libya, a secondary goal might be to provide limited assistance to the rebels by destroying air, armor and artillery assets.
Posted by: cheap nfl jerseys | 09/07/2011 at 03:14 AM
First is the value of a people's uprising against a single-party police state ruler and the quality or stability of the governance that results from that rebellion. The fact that some kind of Jeffersonian ideal is unlikely, and that in fact another authoritarian police state may even be likely does not diminish the value, nor the necessity of the uprising. That the people rose up together and deposed Gadhafi is an unmitigated GOOD THING, and we can still be hopeful that something better will take his place.
Posted by: nike air max | 09/07/2011 at 06:32 PM
If the amount of Dragon Nest Gold,http://www.playerassist.com/dragonnest/ you order from us is less than 1000K, we are typically able to deliver within 10 mins to 1 hour after verification.
Posted by: Zara Miller | 10/11/2011 at 07:45 PM
Great idea...you have some of my favorite people contributing to your blog. I enjoy it a great deal. I'm still working out how to do links neatly but in the meantime will keep it as a post...up now.
Posted by: stock item | 10/27/2011 at 09:13 PM
Great idea...you have some of my favorite people contributing to your blog. I enjoy it a great deal. I'm still working out how to do links neatly but in the meantime will keep it as a post...up now.
Posted by: stock item | 11/07/2011 at 07:26 PM
I will only say - the truth is not neither so black neither so white. We all must think beyond our media want us to think.
Posted by: hgh releasers | 11/09/2011 at 03:49 AM
Great post. Will look the others too.
Posted by: Triactol | 11/09/2011 at 03:50 AM
Workers in the General construction industry face many safety hazards while working on a jobsite.
Posted by: arizona landscaping company | 11/30/2011 at 05:50 AM
With current economic condition in the same manner it is very, I decided to cook a guide to filing joblessness benefits. The group notion ended up being to mention that your being out of work programme succeeds, what is the industry-standard is designed processing alternatively rejecting pages, and thereafter add in levels such as by myself suffer as to what one of the best practices as well as the average flaws are developing filing jobless positives.
Posted by: Air Jordan Alpha | 02/08/2012 at 01:08 AM